Somebody Has to Sit Down: The Coming Shortage of Civic Leadership That Lafayette's Businesses Can't Afford to Ignore
Photo: Alvaro A Novo, CC BY-SA 3.0, via Wikimedia Commons
There is a scene playing out in meeting rooms across Lafayette with growing frequency: an agenda printed, a quirk of parliamentary procedure ready, and an empty chair where a colleague used to sit. Nominating committees are working harder to produce the same slate. Term limits are expiring without successors lined up. Organizations that anchored the community for decades are, in some cases, quietly wondering whether the next fiscal year's leadership will be drawn from a pool of the willing or merely the remaining.
This is not a nonprofit's problem. It is a business problem, and it is time the local business community started treating it like one.
The Pipeline Is Drying Up — Quietly
The demographic and economic forces are well documented nationally: retiring leaders who held multiple seats for decades, mid-career professionals whose calendars are consumed by work and caregiving, and a younger generation that engages differently — episodically, digitally, and often outside formal institutions. What gets less attention is how the shortage compounds locally. Board service has always been an apprenticeship; today's committee members are tomorrow's chamber presidents, economic development board chairs, and nonprofit executives. When the pipeline thins, the deficit doesn't show up this year. It shows up in five, when the people who should have been groomed simply aren't there.
Lafayette's civic and business infrastructure — the organizations that shape workforce development, downtown vitality, infrastructure priorities, and quality of life — runs on volunteer governance. Those bodies do not function on goodwill alone. They function on people who show up, read the materials, and vote.
Why Businesses Should Treat This as Strategy, Not Charity
Here is the uncomfortable framing most companies avoid: a vacant seat on a consequential local board is an influence vacuum, and influence vacuums get filled — by someone else's priorities.
Consider what actually gets decided in these rooms. Zoning and development recommendations that determine where customers and employees will live. Workforce programs that determine the talent pipeline. Quality-of-place investments that determine whether the professionals your company recruits choose to stay. A business that treats board service as a networking luxury — a line in an executive's bio — forfeits a seat at the table where its own operating environment is shaped.
The companies that understand this behave differently. They budget for board service the way they budget for professional development, treating the hours as an investment with measurable returns: early visibility into policy shifts, relationships that shorten sales cycles, and a recruiting story for ambitious employees who want their work to matter beyond the office. They nominate deliberately, matching rising leaders to organizations where both the mission and the company's interests align.
What This Actually Requires
The objection writes itself: everyone is busy, and adding board obligations to an overcommitted professional's calendar is a recipe for resentment and burnout. Fair. But the answer to scarcity is not abstention — it is better deployment.
Businesses can start by auditing their current civic footprint. Which organizations does the company already support financially? Which causes do employees care about? Where would a single well-prepared director create the most value, for the organization and the company alike? One engaged board member outperforms three distracted ones, and organizations would rather have a committed director who attends than a decorated name who doesn't.
Companies can also lower the barrier for others. Covering the time cost of service, celebrating it in performance reviews rather than treating it as a distraction, and building a bench of employees ready for committee work all convert a company's civic presence from an individual hobby into an institutional capability.
The Chair Is Not Going to Fill Itself
Lafayette's economic future will be decided, in large part, in rooms where volunteers sit around tables and make decisions that no market force would make on its own. Those rooms need the business community present — informed, invested, and willing to do the unglamorous work of governance.
The empty chair is an invitation. The only question is whether Lafayette's businesses will accept it now, on their own terms, or later, after someone else has taken the seat and set the agenda. Somebody has to sit down. It should be you — and it should be soon.